My last blog
post was incomplete. The part that needed more was the understanding of the four relationships.
Though, even with making this more complete, it will ultimately
still be incomplete. Only Always. There is always be more to be said.
Let’s start with
where I ended last time.
Remember I said
there was 4 Relationships:
1)
Women to Women
2) Women to Men
3) Men to Women
4) Men to Men.
2) Women to Men
3) Men to Women
4) Men to Men.
I still believe there are these 4 types, but only two of them really matter.
The other two are
only symptoms.
The two that
matter are the way Women see Men(2) and Men see Women(3).
There is an interdependence
between the two.
The other two, Women to Women(1) and Men to Men(4), make it seem that women or men can have views of themselves independent of the way the opposite sex sees them or the way they see the opposite sex.
That is NOT
true.
“No man is an island” and neither is “No woman.”
And, men are not
an island, even collectively, and neither are women.
Most women’s
help movements focus mostly on women to women problems (Ex: body image issues which can lead to
eating disorders, etc.) and as I had suggested before in my last blog post, it’s
time to extend it further.
BUT…
Instead of doing
all four equally, I would now see it better to stop doing the 1st way, or at least not make it a priority (women to women) and not ever even start doing the 4th way, or if you do its not the focus (men to men), but
focus mainly on the 2nd and 3rd ways (women to men and men to women).
That is the only
way to solve either the problem with men or the problem with women. It’s not merely a problem with either side or both sides independently, but the interdependence between them.
How they see themselves is a fruit how they see each other.
How they see themselves is a fruit how they see each other.